Why Diet Quality Matters

Recent studies show that a diet of high-quality, nutritious foods, like the Mediterranean diet, can slash Type 2 diabetes risk. A healthy diet can boost metabolism even without weight loss, and plant-forward meals in midlife can help you age disease-free.

The bottom line? You don’t need to fixate on the number on the scale: what you eat plays a much bigger role in shaping your future health than you may realize.

Dr. Qi Sun, associate professor at Harvard, summarized the long-term impact of healthy eating: “The foods we choose in midlife set the foundation for how well we live decades later.” In other words, your dinner plate today is an investment in your 70-year-old self.

The Weight-Loss Trap

Let’s face it: most people measure the success of a diet – or their lifestyle – by what the bathroom scale says. Unless one is on a GLP-1 drug, weight loss is notoriously hard to achieve and even harder to maintain. This often leaves people discouraged—assuming they’ve failed when the pounds don’t budge.

Losing weight isn’t the entire goal. New research calls for a shift in thinking: the benefits of nutrition. The food you eat can transform your health at the cellular, metabolic, and cognitive levels. The 2025 studies you’ll soon read about weren’t designed for weight loss—they were designed to unlock sustained health and longevity.

Think of it like tending to a garden: you may not see the plants grow taller overnight, but with the right soil, sunlight, and water, they thrive throughout the season—resilient, productive, and full of life.

Study #1: Mediterranean Diet + Lifestyle = 31% Lower Diabetes Risk

A major study published in Annals of Internal Medicine (August 2025) tracked adults at risk for Type 2 diabetes who followed a Mediterranean-style diet rich in vegetables, fruits, olive oil, legumes, nuts, and fish. Researchers found that when combined with calorie reduction, moderate exercise, and weight-loss support, participants lowered their risk of developing Type 2 diabetes by 31% compared to diet alone.

The success of the study was based on blood glucose control, measuring fasting glucose, HbA1c, insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR), body BMI, blood pressure, and lipid profiles.

Dr. Frank Hu, professor of nutrition and epidemiology at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, emphasized the importance of synergy, stating that “modest, sustained changes in diet and lifestyle could prevent millions of cases of diabetes worldwide.”

The takeaway? Eating better matters. But pairing diet with physical activity and behavior support multiplies the benefits. Small, consistent adjustments in daily life can help stave off one of the world’s most pressing chronic diseases.

Ensure that your Mediterranean diet also includes high-quality protein, which is essential for muscle maintenance and provides vital nutrients.

You can find more about the importance of proteins and the various types of proteins on our site.

Study #2: Diet Improves Metabolism—Even Without Weight Loss

Another Harvard study, published in June 2025, found that those who did lose weight had better health markers than those who didn’t. “ Each kilogram lost was associated with 1.44% increase in HDL cholesterol, 1.37% in triglycerides, a 2.46% drop in insulin, a 2.79% drop in leptin, and a .49-unit reduction in liver fat, along with reductions in blood pressure and liver enzymes.”

Yet benefits exist for those who have a hard time losing those few pounds. Researchers found that nearly one-third of participants improved key health markers despite not losing a single pound. Markers included increased HDL, decreased triglycerides, lowered insulin levels and leptin, decreased liver fat measure via imaging, decreased liver enzymes based on ALT and AST, which are markers of liver function, decreased blood pressure, and reductions in visceral fat levels—despite not losing a single pound.

Lead author Anat Yaskolka Meir reframed what counts as dietary success: “People who do not lose weight can improve their metabolism and reduce their long-term risk for disease.”

The findings show that you don’t have to lose weight for your body to thank you. Positive shifts in blood sugar control, cholesterol, and even hormonal balance can happen just by changing what you eat.

It’s like switching from cheap fuel to premium gas—even if the car looks the same, the internal systems run more efficiently and break down less often.

Study #3: Plant-Rich Diets Linked to Healthy Aging

The benefits of diet don’t stop with diabetes prevention or metabolic health. They extend across the entire lifespan.

A Nature Medicine study (March 2025) followed more than 105,000 adults over 30 years. The findings: those who ate plant-rich, minimally processed diets had far higher odds of reaching age 70 free from chronic disease, with stronger mental, cognitive, and physical function.

Specifically, people with the highest adherence to healthy eating patterns were twice more likely to age healthily. This was concluded based on the absence of chronic disease markers for cancers, heart disease, and diabetes; and brain imaging assessments that show memory, acuity, and brain aging, improved mobility, strength, and lower fragility scores, as well as healthy eating pattern indexes.

So what did “healthy eating patterns” actually mean in the study? Researchers used established diet-quality scores such as the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI).

High scorers consistently ate:

  • A variety of fruits and vegetables (especially leafy greens and colorful produce)
  • Whole grains instead of refined grains
  • Legumes, nuts, and seeds as regular protein and fiber sources
  • Lean proteins like fish and poultry in moderation
  • Healthy fats, especially olive oil and other plant oils

And they consistently limited:

  • Processed meats
  • Sugar-sweetened beverages
  • Highly processed snacks and packaged foods high in sodium, added sugars, or refined starches

In short, the people who aged best weren’t following a fad or restrictive diet—they were eating a balanced, plant-forward, minimally processed diet over decades.

Marketing vs. Reality: Don’t Be Fooled

Diet products are often promoted as quick fixes—low-carb, sugar-free, “metabolism boosting.” But these studies remind us that the science of nutrition isn’t about gimmicks.

An energy drink won’t make up for a good night’s sleep. A weight-loss shake isn’t the same as building a pattern of balanced, whole foods. And weight on the scale doesn’t capture the cellular, metabolic, and cognitive shifts happening inside your body.

We are certainly not saying that losing weight, when necessary, isn’t an important marker of health, but it isn’t the only marker, and shouldn’t be prioritized over other markers like blood work, digestion, good sleep, focus, improved mood, and cognitive clarity.

Practical Consumer Takeaways

  • Don’t obsess over the scale. Track your energy, blood work, digestion, and mood as indicators of success. Be sure to discuss your health markers with your doctor.
  • Aim for incorporating plants. Load your plate with vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, and whole grains.
  • Add, don’t subtract. Instead of fixating on what to cut, focus on adding high-quality foods.
  • Pair diet with lifestyle. Even light movement, stress management, and consistent sleep enhance the benefits.
  • Think long-term. Your food choices today shape your risk of chronic disease and quality of life decades from now.

Proteins, fats, carbs—nutrition is a web of essential pieces. But 2025 research reinforces a simple truth: it’s not about dieting down, it’s about eating up—quality, variety, and consistency.

Redrawing the Global Soybean Map

The other day, I performed my morning news check in the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and on social media with X. Soybeans are now featured almost daily in support of our farmers coupled with tariffs and China.

Soybeans are not just another crop, they are a pillar of our food supply, fueling people, animals, and vehicles worldwide. They are a cornerstone of the entire food system.

Soybeans on Center Stage

Now, soybeans have become a weapon — a weapon China is using against the United States in retaliation for technology tariffs and stealing intellectual property. The American farmer is caught in the whirlpool of lower soybean prices, oversupply of unsold inventory, and tariff implications on their input costs.

To better understand the implications of the global soybean trade, we spoke to Gordon Denny, a prominent member of the United Soybean Board.

While speaking with Denny, he stated:

“Nowadays, politicians use food, agriculture and commodities as political levers without realizing the long-term implications of creating new trade relationships away from the U.S….killing trade balances and trade reliability, forcing huge investments by China in other countries, and ten other bad things.” 

Last year, soybeans accounted for nearly $47 billion – almost a fifth – of all U.S. farm cash receipts.  That’s more than wheat, cotton, vegetables or all other crops, and second only to corn as the financial lifeblood of farming.

Despite the size of this market, growing soybeans is not for the faint of heart. Over the past 20 years, prices of soybeans fluctuated from $5.59 per bushel in 2006 to $17.04 in 2023.

Increased demand from China, combined with higher yields per acre resulting from technological advancements such as GMO seeds, precision agriculture, and better use of fertilizers, pesticides, and water has led to a significant increase in acreage planted.

Global production has grown from 36 million metric tons in 1980 to 424 million metric tons in 2025. Brazil is the largest producer at 40% and the U.S. is next at 28%.

Ten years ago, the U.S. used to grow 70% of China’s imported soybeans. But it wasn’t just the trade war that shifted beans to Brazil.

In 2013, Brazil surpassed the U.S. as the largest soybean producer because their cost of production per acre is $54 lower. While their input costs such as fertilizers, fuel, machinery are higher, they can grow both corn and soybeans in the same season. Furthermore, they have more available acreage and at a significantly lower price: an acre in Brazil costs about $44, whereas the U.S. costs $182.

Who Eats the Most Soybeans?

Soybeans are a critical component of our diets. One cup of soybeans has about 28 grams of protein, 15g of healthy fats, and 17g of carbohydrates. But they are also full of fiber, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc and other minerals and vitamins.

Because they are so nutritious and digestible for animal growth and development, about 70% of the U.S. crop is crushed into feed for beef, pork, chickens, and turkeys. About 15% is for human consumption, like salad and cooking oils, and one of many ingredients in packaged foods. The rest of the oil is used for bio-diesel and other industrial products.

Surprisingly, the largest consumers of global soybeans are hogs in China. And that is what the conversation is all about.

China has over 427 million pigs versus the United States’ 76 million. All those hogs need to be fed and soybean meal is a high-quality protein for muscle growth. It also has the important digestible mineral phosphorus for growth and development.

China: The Big Dog in Global Soybean Trade

China is the undisputed top dog in global soybean trade – and much more akin to a Tibetan mastiff than a pug.  China accounts for 61% of all soybean trade, with imports ranging from 88 to 100 million tons annually in recent years, according to Statista. That’s a huge increase from 10.4 million tons in 2000.

Prior to trade issues, U.S. growers had 61% of the China soybean market, now valued at $60 billion. Now it’s 22%, according to the American Soybean Association. China’s retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports, value-added tax and most-favored nation duties place U.S growers at a serious disadvantage.

In fact, as of today, China has made no purchases of U.S. soybeans in the past two months and has no orders of U.S. beans in this harvest season.

While U.S. soybean growers have had to deal with the adverse effects of the on-going trade dispute with China, Brazilian growers have stepped into the fill that gap.

The value of Brazilian soybean exports to China has gone from $15.8 billion in 2015 to just under $39 billion in 2023.

Argentina also has expanded soybean acreage and now produces almost 18 percent of the world’s total soybean crop, becoming a growing factor in global soybean trade.

A History of Trade and Tariffs

In 2018, President Trump announced that Chinese technology transfer, intellectual property theft, and joint venture requirements were detrimental to U.S. trade, and ultimately the consumer. He placed a 25% tariff on China exports to the U.S.

China hit the U.S. farmer hard with retaliatory tariffs on agriculture products, specifically soybeans. Chinese imports of U.S. soybeans dropped to 16mm tons from 33mm tons in 2017. The price dropped by $2.00 a bushel.

A truce was reached with an understanding that no more tariffs would be imposed, and China would purchase U.S. exports — including soybeans. However, China did not live up to its commitment. President Trump gave the U.S. farmers up to $28 billion in subsidies to make up the difference.

Fast forward to 2025: another trade war. A 125% tariff on Chinese imports and an 84% tariff on U.S. exports to China. As of today, China has refused to purchase even one soybean from the U.S.  Instead, they are turning to Brazil and Argentina to feed their pork population.

Farmers Watching as History Repeats

All this has led to a negative soybean margin for the farmer. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) cost of production estimates in June pegged soybean production costs at $639 per acre in 2025, rising to a projected $650 next year.  The USDA numbers reflect operating costs (e.g., seed, fertilizer, chemicals, fuel, repairs) and fixed costs (e.g., labor, taxes, insurance, machinery).

At an average yield of 53.3 bushels per acre, USDA data indicates that the overall cost of production for soybeans works out to $11.99 per bushel. For next year, according to the arithmetic, the total rises to $12.20.

The news is not good. Soybean futures contracts for this autumn currently are trading at about $9.98. USDA places average soybean prices for 2025/26 at $10.00 — a negative $2.20 per bushel of soybeans.

Understanding that a strong part of his support base are farmers, President Trump has announced another $10 billion aid package for farmers – the funds coming from current tariff revenue.

Agricultural Secretary Brooke Rollins plans to visit Vietnam, Japan, India, Peru, Brazil, and the United Kingdom in hopes to create new soybean export markets. Finally, there is also $285 million allocated to farmers as part of the Big Beautiful Bill.

“A trade disruption bailout does help farmers through a very tough spot that they had no part in starting. It does help the overall farm economy and helps politicians maintain votes.”

– Gordon Denny, United Soybean Board

Farmers Want Markets…Not Subsidies

But farmers want more than an aid package. As Denny stated, “farmers do not want government handouts, they want markets. Right now, the world has too many soybeans. There needs to be demand to pull the price of soybeans to farmer profitability.”

The ag industry isn’t the only one requiring government assistance…in fact, no industry is immune.

The U.S. government steps in with subsidies and bailouts when key industries face economic hardship, market instability, or strategic threats that could harm jobs, national security, or essential goods.

These interventions can include financial institution and airline bailouts after crises, or energy incentives to stabilize supply and protect the broader economy.

But how about the Renewable Fuel Standards? Will that help the ag industry? In July 2025, the Trump Administration announced a slight increase in overall fuels.

On behalf of U.S. soybean farmers, American Soybean Association expressed support for the rule, noting that it raises volume requirements for biomass-based diesel by 67%.

According to Denny, that is just another subsidy. “We need animal mouths. The more protein people eat, the more animals that are grown, and the more soybeans are crushed into feed. But right now, there are not enough animals to pull the U.S. farmer out of the doldrums.”

Again, the demand is not strong enough to completely solve the soybean oversupply and all renewable fuels require subsidies, tax credits, mandates, and tariff protection.

Sugar: Are All Sweeteners Equal?

From agave nectar and granulated sugar to high fructose corn syrup and molasses, sugar seems to be everywhere and added to everything. Most of us want to cut back on consuming sugar products, but somehow, they still find sneaky ways into many of the foods we eat.

And despite our team’s research on sugar’s connection to chronic diseases, like obesity, heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, we still struggle to reduce our own intake. And who can blame us? It just tastes too good sometimes.

Consider this example: The D2D team’s morning coffee

I used stevia in my coffee for a long time, but it increased my desire for sweetness throughout the day, so I switched to a few grams of turbinado sugar and found my mid-day sugar cravings reduced.

Another team member carefully monitors glucose levels, relying on a stevia-erythritol product to reduce glucose spikes.

And another member uses a teaspoon of locally-sourced honey. Honey in coffee? Why not, I suppose…

So…which sugar choice is healthiest?  Let’s start with the basics first…

What Is Sugar, Really?

If you ask a chemistry teacher what exactly sugar is, you’d most likely hear these distinct types: monosaccharides, disaccharides, and polysaccharides.

  • Monosaccharides are simple sugars, or single sugar molecules like glucose, fructose, and galactose.
  • Disaccharides and polysaccharides are compound sugars, which are two or more simple sugars being bonded together, like sucrose (glucose + fructose) and lactose (glucose + galactose).

In addition to each type of sugar being distinct in chemical structure, they can also differ in processing, taste, and how your body initially metabolizes it. However, they all provide our bodies with energy to keep moving…but we only need so much fuel. If we consume more sugar than our bodies need, the excess will be stored as fat.

Building with Simple Sugars

Monosaccharides are the building blocks of sugar, with glucose being the primary source of fuel in our bodies.

Glucose: What cells use directly for energy

Most foods in our everyday diet break down into glucose. Because of its simple structure, glucose is quickly metabolized in the body, thus immediately causing blood sugar to spike, giving it the highest glycemic index of 100.

Fructose: Requires the liver to process

Before converting to energy, the liver must first metabolize fructose. Because of this, consuming too much fructose can lead to fat accumulation in the liver, raise triglycerides, and contribute to metabolic issues. Often found naturally in fruits and syrups, fructose has a significantly lower glycemic index of 20, despite being almost twice as sweet as glucose.

Galactose: Found in dairy products

The body converts galactose to glucose or uses it in other metabolic pathways. This lesser sweet monosaccharide isn’t in most public health discussions because it’s generally moderated via dairy consumption.

Basic Compound Sugars: Sucrose & Lactose

Disaccharides and polysaccharides require some digestion because of their more complex molecular structure.

Sucrose: Glucose bonded with fructose

Sucrose must be broken down into glucose and fructose before it’s metabolized in your cells and liver, respectively. It has a glycemic index of 60.

Sucrose is a naturally occurring carbohydrate in many fruits, vegetables, and grains. It’s also in processed products, like granulated sugar refined from sugar canes and/or sugar beets (this includes “raw” sugars, like turbinado and demerara).

Lactose: Glucose bonded with galactose

Naturally found in milk and milk products, lactose requires the lactase enzyme for metabolization. If you suffer from lactose intolerance, you most likely have a lactase deficiency, which results in those unpleasant side effects.

Source: Sugar Nutrition Resource Board

Natural Sugar Syrups

Naturally occurring sugar syrups, like agave nectar, maple syrup, and honey, deliver sweetness without the additional processing of other liquid sweeteners and refined sugars.

Because each syrup has varying ratios of glucose and fructose, they affect the body differently so take note if you have diabetes or other health condition.

Honey

Produced by bees from plant nectar, honey contains antioxidants, small amounts of vitamins and minerals, and even has antimicrobial properties. Because of its balanced composition, honey has a similar glycemic index to table sugar at 60.

Maple Syrup

Minimally processed and derived from tree sap, maple syrup is largely composed of sucrose with a little more fructose than honey, putting it at a glycemic index of 55. Maple syrup also has antioxidants and trace minerals, like zinc and manganese.

Agave Nectar

This nectar is almost fully comprised of fructose, resulting in a slower rise in blood sugar with a glycemic index of 20. The low GI is sometimes thought to make it “better,” but excess fructose carries its own risks of liver stress and high triglycerides.

Other natural syrups, like molasses and rice syrup, are often used in refined sugar products, like brown sugar and pancake syrups, respectively.

Processed Sugar Syrups

Processed sugar syrups are made by breaking down starches into a liquid form of simpler sugars. This process includes filtering, clarifying, and concentrating the liquid. Sometimes, processors add enzymes or acids to adjust sweetness and texture, making the syrups easier to blend, preserve, and use in food manufacturing.

Fruit Juice Concentrate

Removing most of the water from fruit juice through evaporation or freezing creates a thick, syrup-like product to be reconstituted later or used as a sweetener in packaged foods and beverages. It has a glycemic index of anywhere from 40 to 70, depending on the fruit used for the concentrate.

Corn Syrup

It’s derived from corn and is composed mainly of glucose. However, depending on how much processing it undergoes, it can also contain small amounts of other sugars, like maltose. It has a GI of 75.

High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)

This is a very common sweetener in sodas, drinks, and sauces. Most HFCS has a slightly higher fructose level (~55%) than table sugar. Though not as high in fructose as agave nectar, some research finds that its higher fructose content can stress the liver more than pure glucose or even sucrose.

What Research Tells Us

Research continues to prove that no matter the source – honey, cane sugar, HFCS, organic sugars – too much of any of these products can harm your health.

So don’t be fooled into thinking that cane sugar-sweetened Coca Cola is a healthy alternative to its current high fructose corn syrup form, or that small-batch candy made from organic agave nectar is nutritionally superior to its supermarket counterpart.

Interestingly, when scientists compared glucose and fructose, they found the differences aren’t huge under normal eating conditions.

But when diets are high in both fat and sugar, fructose appears to hit the liver harder—raising triglycerides and increasing fat storage.

And health organizations around the globe concur with these findings. The U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends less than 10% of our daily calories come from added sugar; and the American Heart Association recommends limiting added sugar to a stringent 6 to 9 teaspoons per day, no matter the sugar’s source.

These limits are set with good intentions given recent findings in added sugar’s myriad ill effects. A 2022 review in Metabolism and Health Impacts of Dietary Sugars pulled together evidence linking high sugar intake with obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes.

When it comes to natural sweeteners, not all are created equal. Honey and agave syrup are both often marketed as “better” alternatives to refined sugar, but they behave differently in the body.

Honey has antioxidants and seems to support healthier outcomes on several metrics. In contrast, agave nectar has a lower glycemic index but packs in more fructose, which can work against its benefits, if consumed in excess.

The takeaway? Even with natural sweeteners, moderation matters. But when push comes to shove, honey – whether in your coffee or added to your oatmeal – may be the slightly friendlier option.

How can we reduce our sugar intake?

Here are some quick guidelines as to how, what, and when to consume sugars:

  • Understand that all added sugars contribute to caloric load. Overconsuming any sugars – glucose, fructose, honey, corn syrup, and so on – will contribute to weight gain risk, dental issues, insulin resistance, heart disease, and other chronic conditions.
  • Limit overall added sugar intake to recommended amounts. Try to stick with the equivalent of no more than 6 packets (or 6 teaspoons) of sugar a day. For example, a 12-oz. can of Coke has almost 10 teaspoons of sugar, and a 20-oz. bottle of Gatorade has 9 teaspoons.
  • And limit no and low-calorie sweeteners, too. Many of these products have been shown to have harmful effects on our health. Aspartame, saccharine and sucralose can harm our cardiovascular health and gut microbiome, and xylitol and erythritol can negatively affect cognition and blood clotting.
  • Choose whole foods. Fruit, vegetables, and dairy products naturally contain sugar as part of their nutrient profile. Plus, they include all sorts of important nutrients and fiber to improve health and fill you up for longer.
  • When you want sweets, pick higher quality options. Natural options, like honey and maple syrup, tend to have antioxidants and trace nutrients. Plus, they aren’t usually consumed in large, concentrated doses, like processed syrups.
  • Hidden sugars are everywhere! Read the ingredients list, especially in food products like drinks, snacks, cereals, dressings, breads and sauces. Look out for ingredients ending in “-ose” (e.g., maltose, dextrose), and that organic sugar is still sugar.
  • Use flavor-boosting enhancements. Including ingredients like spices like tumeric, citrus, herbs, vinegars and wine to your recipes can help you reduce added sugars without losing taste.